College football is in the middle of a reckoning. Thirteen midseason firings, record-breaking buyouts, and an NIL arms race have turned the sport’s most powerful programs into some of its least stable. In this new 5 part series, I explore how championship coaches are struggling to adapt, why non-football schools are thriving, and what the “business of belief” reveals about the future of college athletics. The money, the pressure, and the shifting power dynamic between coaches, players, and boosters — it’s all here.

Part 5: The Reckoning Ahead

College football has always been cyclical. Coaches come and go. Programs rise and fall. But what’s happening now feels different. The pace of turnover, the financial stakes, and the cultural pressure are pushing the sport toward a breaking point that money alone may not be able to fix.

The Numbers No One Wants to Confront

By midseason this year, 13 head coaches at FBS programs had already been fired — a record pace even by modern standards. Many of them had signed contract extensions in the past 24 months. Several had led their teams to major bowls or conference titles within the last five years.

It’s not just that expectations have risen; it’s that patience has vanished. Athletic directors are operating in a world where every Saturday feels like a referendum on leadership. And every underwhelming season feels like justification to start over.

The result: a system where universities are spending tens of millions of dollars each year to stay in the same place.

The Donor Dilemma

That financial strain hasn’t yet been felt by fans, because boosters — often a handful of wealthy alumni — keep covering the cost. But NIL has changed the calculus.

Now, those same donors are being asked to fund player collectives, recruiting initiatives, and retention bonuses in addition to coaching buyouts and facilities. It’s a collision of priorities that can’t last forever.

Sooner or later, boosters will have to choose between funding the next coach or funding the roster — and more than a few will pick the latter.

The NIL Generation Isn’t Waiting

For years, universities held the leverage. Coaches had security, players had restrictions, and money flowed one way — upward. But NIL flipped the pyramid.

Today’s elite athletes know their value, and many are making business decisions that would have been unthinkable five years ago. A five-star quarterback might choose a mid-tier program with strong NIL support over a traditional power struggling to stabilize its coaching staff.

In other words: the players have options, and instability has consequences.

The Coming Market Correction

Eventually, college football will face a reckoning that looks a lot like what’s happening in professional sports. Programs will be forced to operate with more discipline, align athletic and NIL budgets, and treat coaching changes as strategic investments rather than emotional reactions.

Expect to see:

• Smaller buyouts, as schools negotiate more balanced contracts.

• Performance-based extensions tied to NIL and recruiting outcomes.

• Consolidation among collectives, as donor fatigue sets in.

• And eventually, fewer schools competing at the highest financial tier, as the arms race becomes too expensive to sustain.

The irony? The schools that adapt first — those that treat NIL as part of an integrated athletic business model, rather than a side hustle — will end up being more stable, not less.

The Future Belongs to the Builders

I believe that the next generation of college football leaders won’t be the biggest spenders; they’ll be the best organizers. They’ll align donor energy, NIL resources, and coaching philosophy into a single, coherent system.

They’ll recognize that belief still matters, but belief backed by structure and discipline is far more powerful than belief fueled by panic.

The programs that fail to adapt aren’t just risking another losing season. They’re risking irrelevance in a sport that’s evolving faster than ever.

Epilogue: The Cost of Staying Competitive

College football has never been more popular, or more precarious.

Every Saturday still delivers the drama fans crave, but behind the scenes, the economics have become unsustainable. Thirteen midseason firings. Tens of millions in buyouts. Donor-funded collectives competing with donor-funded buyouts. Coaches chasing stability in an unstable system. Players learning to operate as businesses in programs that still run on emotion.

This is the new reality: a sport driven by belief and tradition, but governed increasingly by market forces it doesn’t fully understand.

The NIL era has pulled back the curtain on how money, power, and identity shape the modern college game. It’s exposed the inefficiencies — the endless coaching cycles, the misplaced loyalties, the institutional fear of irrelevance — while giving athletes more leverage than ever before.

And yet, amid all the volatility, a few programs are quietly thriving. Schools that aren’t weighed down by massive football operations — or that have found disciplined ways to align their NIL, donor, and athletic priorities — are building something far more sustainable.

They’ve learned that success in 2025 and beyond won’t come from outspending the competition. It will come from out-organizing it.

At the end of the day, belief and hope still matter. They fill stadiums, fuel donations, and keep fans coming back. But belief and hope without structure have become the most expensive commodity of all.

Reach out for more info! [email protected]

Copyright © 2025 Selby Strategies. All rights reserved.